Skip to content

Red Sox offer Beckett four-year deal; Olney says both sides “optimistic”

March 30, 2010

Josh Beckett has a four-year offer on the table from the Boston Red Sox. Will he take it or look for more on the free-agent market?

*Note: See an update at the bottom of this article.*

Through the years, the Boston Red Sox have shied away from aggressively trying to sign players to longterm deals that take them past the age of 35. It has been a guideline that 37-year old General Manager Theo Epstein has frequently abided by. After the 2008 season, the Red Sox offered third baseman Mike Lowell a three-year deal when the Philadelphia Phillies were offering four. Lowell, surprisingly, took the lesser deal. Before that, they had done the same with Pedro Martinez, but they lost out to the New York Mets, as he took their four-year offer. They offered outfielder Jason Bay a four-year deal worth less one proposed by the Mets, and he took the more lucrative deal.

Boston has not wanted, for whatever reason, to sign their own players to longterm contracts. But they want their fans to think they do, hence the doing-our-duty offers.

Starting pitcher Josh Beckett appears to be the newest product of the Red Sox game.

In some cases, Epstein’s philosophy is a smart one. Martinez was on his last legs and was not worth such a longterm deal. Not offering a sulking Manny Ramirez a longterm deal was intelligent, but more often than not Epstein has been in the wrong. He refused to make a real effort to re-sign 31-year old Jason Bay, not wanting to give him the annual salary and the longevity the New York Mets eventually did. And now, Beckett has been offered an insulting deal.

The 29-year old ace whom they gave up current and future star Hanley Ramirez for in a 2006 deal with the Florida Marlins is entering the final year of his contract. He has had some rough spots over the past few seasons, but has overall deserved the title of ace. In his four years with the Red Sox, Beckett has logged 719 1/3 innings (throwing 200-plus in three seasons), while winning 65 games and posting an acceptable 4.03 ERA. With such numbers, he should be in line for a 6-to-7 year deal like the one the same-aged CC Sabathia received prior to last season. But, Boston is not willing to sign him for such a period.

Instead, they have a four-year offer on the table worth in the $65-70 million range, sources close to the pitcher have told ESPN’s Buster Olney. I’m sure Beckett could get much more on the open market given his overwhelming success and his reputation as a ‘big game pitcher.’ It is sometimes necessary to limit the length of a contract, considering how much of a risk it is to sign players in their prime well into their aging years. But Boston, with Lackey as a prime example, have signed players with much bigger health risks than Beckett–like J.D. Drew and Daisuke Matsuzaka–to five-year deals.

Some say Epstein signed Lackey to be Beckett’s replacement atop the rotation. But, of course, this was not told to Beckett himself. Boston, whether it’s an act or not, wants to make the player feel they genuinely want to re-sign them. They offer them a deal, such as in Beckett’s case as well as Bay’s before him, that is on the lower end. The contract offer they hope tells fans they are trying. The ball is now in his court. And that’s exactly where Boston wants it to be.

In the case of Bay, the team was worried about signing a strikeout-prone and only average-fielding outfielder to a five-year contract and, in the back of their mind, it seemed they were even more worried about the possibility of injury. Bay was an important piece to their success. He fit in Boston. But the team instead chose to throw the money he could have received to sign the same-aged Lackey, who had a injury-shortened final season with the Anaheim Angels and had been bothered by a mirage of shoulder issues. There has been no consistency. Since Lowell is the last aging player to be re-signed, it just seems they would much rather sign free-agents than re-sign their own players.

Beckett has few negatives. They have little reason not to give him what he deserves. Same with thirty-one year old Kevin Youkilis, their immensely talented first baseman who has calmly and rather minimally expressed frustration by the lack of an extension. Epstein has taken the approach he perceives intelligent, but overall it’s difficult to find a method to his madness. He disrespects his players by offering below their dollar-value and, in doing so, takes on a rather unflattering and pungent reputation.

Despite Olney saying “there is optimism a deal will be completed in the next week or two,” this proposed offer, though lucrative, has to be insulting to Beckett. He just saw the Red Sox sign Lackey, two years his senior and one who has missed more time than him to injury, to the $82.5 million deal. Given his relative youth and how much he has given the Red Sox, surely Boston would up the ante and give him a deal far superior to his rotation-mate, right? Though Beckett has said he relatively stays out of negotiations and leaves the process to his agent and the team, he had to be put off my this offer.

He has to wonder if the team really wants him. Given the team’s past, I am not entirely sure they do.

—————————————————–

UPDATE (March 31st):

According to Sports Illustrated’s John Heyman, one of the more respected and reliable insiders:

“The Red Sox and Josh Beckett are closing in on a deal for a four-year extension for close to $70 million, sources close to the situation say. A deal is likely to be announced just after the start of the season.

Extensions completed before the regular season affect the competitive balance tax, so it makes sense for Boston to wait to finalize things.

Beckett’s extension would be in addition to the $12 million he is to make in 2010, giving him five years left at almost exactly the same pay as rotation mate John Lackey, who signed as a free agent with Boston for $82.5 million over five years.”

In an interview with WEEI’s Rob Bradford, Beckett expresses his desire to remain with Boston:

“(The contract negotiations) really haven’t entered my mind at all. I’m not too concerned with it. If it’s meant to be and the Red Sox want me to be here then I’ll stay here because I enjoy playing in Boston. Playing in front of those fans. I can’t imagine going anywhere else. They do everything they can to make us successful as possible and I don’t think there are a whole lot of organizations that do that. It’s not a knock on them, but it’s a testament to how the Red Sox treat their players.”

Advertisement
6 Comments leave one →
  1. March 31, 2010 3:50 am

    Bottom line is that if he is not signed by the time he pitches on Sunday, he is going free agent.

    The ESPN story is just out there for the consumption of Red Sox fans.

    You can’t argue with the Red Sox way of doing business in one respect, and that is when big money is at stake, it is always far better to get rid of a player too soon, than to do so too late.

    That business practice gets in the way of emotional fan sentiment, but in the end, it IS a business, they ain’t runnin’ a soup kitchen, and it is a BIG business.

    So they run this spin in the media to deflect criticism.

    In the end, he will get his 5 year deal in Texas who will match any other offers. They went after him hard when he left Florida, and they look at Beckett as the Nolan Ryan of this generation, who will pack the park every 5th day.

    Players HAVE TO take the best deal, look what the Red Sox did to Bronson Orroyo, and how also they tried repeatedly to dump Lowell, and that is why they most always do take the best offer.

    Jason Bay wasn’t worth that kind of money, and I wouldn’t have wanted to go more than 3 years. Sure he put up decent numbers, partly due to being in a better lineup, but despite what they said at the time, it wasn’t a baseball move, they screwed up with Manny, and Bay was just the best player they could get in return.

    Instead of playing a game of chicken with a lunatic like they did with Ramirez, a game they lost, they should have just picked up one of the option years before the 2008 season and immediately traded him, and they would have gotten a much better return than they got at the deadline.

    They were right on Pedro, and that is why the Met’s were the only team willing to make an offer without an MRI.

    Youklis is a very god hitter, but he is NOT a superstar and shouldn’t be paid like one, which is why the Red Sox have balked.

    The Red Sox have Prince Fielder next opening day, and suddenly Red Sox fans aren’t going to miss Youklis.

    The deal you proposed from Texas, Salty and 2 pitchers, is one that I think Texas would do.

    • swamigp permalink*
      March 31, 2010 9:47 am

      I agree. I don’t think that he will bother talking about an extension during the season. He’ll leave, or at least test the free-agent pool if he isn’t $75 million richer by Opening Day.

      Given Lowell is on the tail, tail end of his career, I definitely could see Boston using Youk and third and Prince at first. Unless of course they send Youk packing and get another third baseman (possibly re-signing Beltre, that is if he can in fact still hit.)

      I think if Beckett were on the trade market and Texas was interested, Feliz would be the hangup. What a talent he is!

      I do think a contract will get done. It seems there is mutual interest, though Boston isn’t making their enthusiasm very clear by offering him an year and $20 million less than they gave the older Lackey.

  2. March 31, 2010 11:12 am

    I think he is as good as gone. He can get the same money or better than Lackey got, so why would he take less.

    Right now it is all just PR on both sides, and Beckett would not look good basically telling the Red Sox to give him 5 years or drop dead, and the Red Sox can’t come out and say they don’t want him back, so both sides are going through this charade.

    They probably could have gotten Feliz over the winter, but certainly not at the deadline, but Texas is regarded as the deepest system in baseball, that is what Nolan Ryan has been putting the organizational emphasis on, and Salty AND two pitchers for a guy with 60 days left on his contract is still a really good score.

    As for Youk, should they get Prince, I think it squeezes Youk out. I think that Beltre will pan out for the Red Sox. He is still relatively young, he has hit before, and it isn’t like he is either hurt or old, so I could see him coming back around, and I think they will have Beltre back next year because they have a very affordable team option.

    Sure Youk could be the DH after Papi is gone, but I think they would be better served dealing him for a higher return, and either bringing Papi back for a 1 year deal on the cheap, or using the DH spot to rotate it around the lineup to keep everyone fresh.

    If they are really going to bring Prince Fielder in, somebody has to go, and provided Beltre hits some, they aren’t going to spend an extra 10 million a year to keep Youklis, just because the fans love him because of all of his demonstrative antics.

    Price Fielder over Youklis is a huge upgrade. The fans will be up in arms, but a few months later, they won’t even remember him, because that is the way fans always are.

  3. March 31, 2010 3:46 pm

    Until there is a deal, there is no deal.

    Boston is notorious for putting out stories in the press that a signing is eminent, and then nothing happens, and then later they say that the player turned down the money because they are greedy, and then even later we find out that there was no offer.

    I would be really surprised if Beckett signs this deal, because Beckett obviously views himself as the better pitcher over Lackey, not his equal, and the only advantage of signing now is if he gets injured, and the chance of that happening is relatively small.

    This could very well be to just preempt stories that are negative toward the front office, ahead of his opening day start.

    Even if Beckett wants to go back to Boston, he is giving up money by signing this deal, because he knows that Texas will match and drive up the price.

    What I did not know is that Lackey has that clause that he play a 6th season at the minimum if he misses time with his elbow.

    You just know that a few years from now, Boston is going to pull some crap where they say according to our team doctor, you have a strained ligament and you need 15 days on the DL.

    If the language is as SI.com represents, that is a bad move by the agent to give an organization notorious for squeezing players over money such wide latitude to play games, better to make the 5th year vest based on innings pitched.

    • swamigp permalink*
      April 1, 2010 12:31 pm

      Yes, I would be surprised too. He has had some injury issues, but he certainly could make in the $100-120 million range on the market. Even though the proposed deal is much less, I feel Boston may regret giving him even four years. He has a world of talent and is still young. He can work his way into the Cy Young race annually. But he gives up far too many homers and, like many pitchers with high-velocity fastballs, if other pitches in his repertoire aren’t working, he will struggle more often than not.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 882 other followers