Swamigp’s Sports Blog

A Sports Blog About Everything Sports

Ellsbury stars for Red Sox in wins over Phillies

Boston Red Sox center-fielder Jacoby Ellsbury was a hazard on the basepaths, reaching base seven times, while scoring four times, including via a home-run, over a two game stretch. (AP Photo/Tom Mihalek)

Boston Red Sox center-fielder Jacoby Ellsbury was a hazard on the basepaths, reaching base seven times, while scoring four times, including via a home-run, over a two game stretch. (AP Photo/Tom Mihalek)

Boston Red Sox center-fielder Jacoby Ellsbury is coming into his own, becoming one of the best center-fielders in the major leagues. His play in the past two games only backed up this fact. The speedster, with the bases-loaded and one out in the 13th inning, slapped a low fastball by Philadelphia Phillies recently re-called Kyle Kendrick past the drawn-in infield, scoring the go-ahead run. Because of his clutch hit, and the two runs that followed, the Red Sox defeated the Phillies.

A day later, Ellsbury was even better. The former Oregon State Beaver rarely ever walks. This is because of his speed. Pitchers don’t want him on the basepaths because he can create a run with his legs. Time and time again, Ellsbury has reached via single, stole second, then scurried to third base on an errant throw. Just like that, all that’s needed for him to score is a well-placed fly-ball. Teams are so worried of this sequence that they try everything possible to make him uncomfortable at the plate, throwing a lot of strikes or pitches too tempting to lay off.

Pitchers think along the lines of this: if he puts the ball in play, at best he has a 33 percent chance of getting a hit. This philosophy has backfired, as Ellsbury has been torrid of late: He’s getting hittable pitches and he’s taking advantage of nearly every one.

Entering the third game of the series with the Phillies, he toted a batting average of .303, while his on-base percentage has steadily increased, and stood at a respectable .351. Both increased even more with another stellar performance. Knowing his speed poses all sorts of problems for the opposition, he was patient, swinging at nothing except pitches in his wheelhouse. So, uncharacteristically, he walked in his first at-bat, watching fastballs from rookie Antonio Bastardo surround the strikezone. His bat stayed on his shoulders over the entirety of the plate appearance, then, struck fear into the hearts of every Phillie by making the satisfactory trot down to first base.

On cue, he swiped second, forcing a rushed and airmailed throw by catcher Carlos Ruiz. Alert, Ellsbury scampered to third base. Ninety-feet away from scoring the first Boston run, he watched Kevin Youkilis walk. He had already stolen home once this season, but, with Bastardo rattled, he wouldn’t dare chance making an out at home, which would quell the rally. I am sure the thought of doing so crossed his mind, but, as potent as the Red Sox offense is, he knew he would eventually score.

Since there was one out and runners at the corners, Bastardo kept an eye on Youkilis at first base. Youkilis isn’t a stolen base threat by any means, but the Phillies would much rather keep the possibility open for a double-play. The first pickoff attempt was successful, but the second wasn’t. The throw was on-target, as many of this variety are, but first baseman Ryan Howard muffed the catch. The ball trickled off his glove and to the backstop. Nonchalantly, he slowly jogged to retrieve it. Ellsbury scored with ease. Youkilis, with a very high baseball I.Q., sped down to second base, peered back at Howard, noticed that he was moving at a snail’s pace, then ran to third base.

Jason Bay watched the events transpire from the batters’ box, then rewarded Youkilis for his hustle. Presumably tired of running, Youkilis was able to walk home, as Bay socked a home-run to center-field. Boston continued to click offensively, as Julio Lugo capped off the five-run first inning with a two-out, two-run single.

Because of the early offensive explosion, Ellsbury was at-bat often. He flied out in the second inning, but worked a walk in the fourth, laying off tantalizing fastballs and changeups by Chad Durbin, who relieved Bastardo after a lengthy rain delay. Nothing came of it, as Youkilis struck out, but his patience and good eye at the plate was a sign of the times.

An inning later, it was his turn again. The Red Sox had already scored three runs in the frame–an rbi-double by Jason Varitek and rbi singles by Lugo and Dustin Pedroia–and they wouldn’t score another in the inning, but Ellsbury still made his presence felt. With two out, he fouled off a cutter from Jack Taschner, then watched four straight miss the strikezone–three fastballs and a slider–to extend the inning for Youkilis.The third-baseman clubbed a fastball 403 feet to deep center-field, but to clear the wall, 408 feet is necessary, as Shane Victorino tracked it down for the over-the-shoulder catch.

Ellsbury’s next at-bat led to runs. With one-out, after Pedroia beat out a potential double-play, he squibbed a Sergio Escalona fastball to shortstop Jimmy Rollins. The slow dribbler was so well placed that Rollins didn’t have a chance, not even to get Pedroia at second base. Julio Lugo scored easily, stretching the margin to three.

In his final at-bat, Ellsbury made up for Youkilis’ close call. He fouled off the first two pitches from J.C. Romero, then took two balls, then fouled off two more fastballs. H saw one too many fastballs for the Phillies liking, nailing the low Romero offering on a line over the right-field fence.

In total, Ellsbury reached base seven times in the two games. Though each didn’t lead to run, there is no question Philadelphia will be thrilled to see him vacate the premises, and take his act to Red Sox next opponent.

June 14, 2009 - Posted by swamigp | Baseball, Boston Red Sox, Major League Baseball, Philadelphia Phillies, Sports | , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

7 Comments »

  1. Dominant pitching performance by the Red Sox today

    Dominant starting pitching out of Beckett.

    Another dominant performance by the best bullpen in baseball.

    An especially dominant performance from Daniel Bard.

    They should just bypass the Rookie of the Year Award and induct him into Cooperstown.

    Peter Gammons says he is the best pitcher to come up in the last generation, and if Peter Gammons says it, I believe it.

    On the other hand, the Yankees suck!

    AJ Burnett got hammered, and Johan Santana toyed with them all day.

    The Red Sox are a team without flaws. They are not only the best team in the history of baseball, they are the best team in the history of sports.

    The Red Sox rock!

    Comment by Eric Gallagher | June 14, 2009 | Reply

  2. Wow…do I sense some sarcasm? It’s one game. Calm down.

    Reality: Red Sox have won 5 of 6, while Yankees have lost 4 of 6.

    Comment by swamigp | June 14, 2009 | Reply

  3. You want to talk about reality?

    Let’s start with your evaluation of Ellsbury.

    He is a good player, and he fits what the Red Sox need because they were lacking a true leadoff hitter for years.

    He is not even close to being the best CF in his own division, never mind in all of baseball.

    There is not one GM in all of baseball who would take Ellsbury over BJ Upton, not one.

    Also, the vast majority would take Vernon Wells, Adam Jones, and Torii Hunter over Ellsbury.

    Half would take Curtis Granderson over Ellsbury, who has the same stolen base potential, and has HR ability.

    That is just 5 guys out of the other 13 CFs in the American League alone.

    Throw in Beltran and Soriano in the NL, and that is just off the top of my head, I really don’t follow the NL too closely, and that puts Ellisbury right where I pegged him in our discussion on this topic in spring training, he is at abut the 66.6 percentile.

    He is NOT developing as a hitter, and at this point it is safe to say that he is exactly what he is, a slap singles hitter who can steal bases. You can live without HRs from a leadoff guy, but he doesn’t even get extra base hits. All he is is a glorified version of Dave Roberts or Juan Pierre.

    He is a useful player, and a productive one, but he is limited. He certainly isn’t a 5 tool player, and perhaps his greatest benefit is that because he is a young player, he does not take up payroll, and that is a large consideration, because he fills a role, and allows them to spend money elsewhere.

    He fills a role.

    He is a role player.

    If they could get a SS who could hit leadoff, they could move Rocco into CF full time and never miss Ellsburry.

    If the Red Sox were having to pay him $5 million a year, they would view him quite differenly.

    I have to ask you a serious question.

    Did you ever even play baseball?

    All of your analysis is based only on other highly subjective reporting, and your own emotions.

    I gave you a lengthy analysis of the deficiencies of the Red Sox compared to the Yankees, and your response was an abbreviated reply that is summary was the Yankees suck and the Red Sox rock.

    I give you detailed analysis that supports my conclusion that Papi is finished and Varitek is not far behind him, and that Nick Green is not an every day player, and you dispute this repeatedly, but never point to any supporting facts.

    Regarding starting pitching, I have presented to you a detailed case that quantity does not necessarily equal quality. Even IF they get Dice K straightened out, and right now that is a huge IF, going into the season they started out hoping that they could cover the back two spots by rotating the hot hand amongst 6 guys, and now that they have ruled out Buckholz and Bowden, and by sending Masterson back to the pen it certainly appears that most likely he is there to stay, at least for this season, what the Red Sox are saying is that they are staking their season on Wakefield who has been both good and bad at times, and having Penney and Smoltz take turns filling the last spot.

    Perhaps you are missing my point that what stated as 6 guys to fill 2 spots is now before the half way point 3 guys to fill 2 spots, and all 3 of them are old guys.

    Maybe that is a good sign to you, but it isn’t considered such by objective people.

    Don’t be surprised if a month from now they are looking at signing either Pedro or Massachusetts native Tom Glavine, which is to say, don’t be surprised if a month from now that committee is own to 1 guy for two spots, and they need to add a pitcher and do not want to pay.

    These are all rational well reasoned and objective points, and your response is to categorically reject them based upon emotion.

    You have repeatedly said that Varitek is going to play every day, remain healthy, and continue to hit, and you say that despite the fact that his offensive production has steadily and rapidly declined since he got off to the great start in April, and he has a track record over the past few years of burning out and breaking down in the summer because he needs a backup to share the workload at his age, and the Red Sox keep trying to get by without paying for one.

    You have said this over and over and over, that they don’t need another catcher, and yet you have never offered up anything to support your belief, which based upon his past few seasons, is a very irrational belief on your part.

    Regarding Ellsbury, you open with your editorial opinion that he is one of the best CFs in the game, it is your lead, yet you offer nothing to support your highly subjective assessment, other than the fact that he has a “respectable” on base percentage.

    Your failure to give any supporting facts or statistics, forces me to conclude that the reason why you think Jacoby Ellsburry is such a good player, is simply because he is from Oregon, and because he plays for the Red Sox.

    Sure, those are good reasons for you to be a fan, but what you need to understand is that being a fan is by definition subjective, not objective.

    Comment by Eric Gallagher | June 14, 2009 | Reply

    • Sure, I am biased, but I don’t favor Ellsbury solely because he played for the Beavers, nor because he’s on my favorite team. I just like what he brings, something the Red Sox haven’t had in a while.

      Yes, I stated boldly that he’s one of the better center-fielders in the game, and yes there are plenty of others that might be better, but he has drastically improved from last season. He’s more disciplined at the plate, laying off pitches he didn’t last season.

      I back up that point. That was the point of dissecting his performances in those two games. No, I don’t say it directly, but the impact that’s implied backs up the statement.

      What’s your obsession with Varitek. He’ll hit .250. He’s not that big a part of their success. He doesn’t carry the team offensively, nor does he. He just has to call a good game. This is why they don’t need another catcher. Kottaras is a good backup, and with their offense in front and behind them, they are giving the Red Sox all they need to.

      I don’t need to support my facts that Green is an everyday player. This is why I wonder if you follow the games. He’s hit .295, and playing nearly every day. The games speak for themselves.

      And yes, I did play baseball; Kidsports. I stopped because my knees were giving me too much trouble.

      Comment by swamigp | June 14, 2009 | Reply

  4. Maybe you are missing my point.

    When you publish an opinion, you really need to back it up with something other than anecdotal points, which is exactly what you did.

    WHEN YOU MAKE YOUR OPINION YOUR LEAD, THEN THE ENTIRE BODY OF YOUR PIECE SHOULD BE YOUR SUPPORTING ARGUMENT AND EVIDENCE AS TO WHY JACOBY ELLSBURY IS ONE OF THE BEST CFs IN ALL OF BASEBALL.

    If anything, the anecdotal details that you provide support the counter opinion that he IS NOT one of the best CFs because his game is totally limited to speed, and he has nothing else to offer.

    I have explained to you several times what my point is with Varitek. I think it is colossally stupid of the Red Sox to go without a competent backup. The Red Sox, for all the complaining they do about the Yankee payroll, have one of the highest payrolls in baseball themselves. Like the Yankees, if they do not get into the playoffs, they actually lose money for the season, and more than just a little.

    Singing a backup catcher for $5 million or less is an insurance policy against their entire payroll. By going cheap, the Red Sox put at risk their entire payroll investment.

    Whats more, if you handicap this from a risk/reward standpoint, it is the equivalent of placing your entire life savings on a horse withe 1/9 odds, which is going to pay you $2.10 for every $2.00 bet.

    It is a foolish risk.

    What they are basically doing is risking probably $30 million, or maybe more, to try to save $5 million, and risking their season in the course of doing so.

    Considering the fact that the Red Sox already got burned once by taking this risk when Varitek sprained his knee on July 31 and the bottom literally dropped out of their season as a result, thus costing the team tens of millions of dollars as a result, because that is the spread on the financial loss they take by not making the playoffs and the windfall profit they would get for qualifying, taking the risk again with an OLDER Varitek is just colossally stupid.

    Apparently the Red Sox organization does not agree with you on Nick Green. They are going to make a trade, but they are likely going to wait 5 weeks more when the cost goes down, and they are going to get a veteran for basically just the cost of paying the remaining salary for the season. Nick Green is a journeyman for a reason. Your .295 is actually down to .286, and he is hitting .250 for June, and he is no better than that. You are looking at too small a sample, and honestly, your repeated arguing that Nick Green is an every day player for a playoff caliber team just demonstrates how grossly subjective you are.

    Nick Green knows what you do not know, that he is not an every day player, and he is just holding down the fort for now.

    Nick Green is 31 years old, has been with six teams in five years. Nick Green knows what he is, and what he is not. I assure you Nick Green isn’t seeing this as his big break and his big chance to become a star and an every day player. He knows that he was lucky to make the club, and only did so because of an injury to Lugo. What Nick Green is thinking is that he desperately hopes to stick with the club for the rest of the season, because that would leave him with needing only a handful of days worth of service time in 2010 to hit the 5 years of service necessary to qualify for the lucrative MLBPA pension plan.

    In terms of their problems, Nick Green is so far down the list he is falling off the page. That is one of the easier correctable problems, but they just need to wait up until the deadline, when the price goes down and they can get a veteran for the cost of a few non prospect minor leaguers and the cost of the $2 million or so to pay the remaining salary for 2009.

    The other problems they have are not as easily addressed in season.

    Comment by Eric Gallagher | June 15, 2009 | Reply

    • Do you know Nick Green? Is he telling you this? Every baseball player is motivated to be a starter. Every baseball player thinks they can be a starter.

      Comment by swamigp | June 15, 2009 | Reply

  5. That is where you are wrong.

    Not every player thinks he can be a starter.

    Sure, when Green came up he thought so, but that is not the way he looks at things now, at 31 years of age, now being with his 6th team in 5 years.

    Also, oftentimes you see guys take a job as a utility player or 4th OF with a contender instead of taking offers with non contenders where they could play every day.

    You really don’t believe Nick Green went to Fort Myers believing he was going to be the starting shortstop, do you?

    There are also guys that think too much of themselves, and believe they are starters when they aren’t, and complain about playing time, and complain that they should be hitting higher in the order.

    You know what happens to those guys?

    They get released, because there are plenty enough other guys who can and will fill a role.

    Some guys never get this, and they end up on the outside looking in, playing for the Newark Bears, or the St. Paul Saints, waiting for a phone call that never comes.

    Nick Green is one of the guys who gets it.

    He knows that it is his job to be a worker, and to be a good guy in the clubhouse, and to always be prepared.

    On the Yankee telecast the broadcasters incessantly refer to him as “our friend Nick Green” and go on and on about how all the guys liked him last year. I have heard the Braves say the same stuff about him in the past.

    The reason why people say this about Nick Green, is because it is true, and the reason why everybody likes him is because Nick Green is one of the guys who gets it.

    People in baseball respect guys like Nick Green, and you can be certain that Francona is one of those guys, and he will do everything he can to keep him around so he gets his 5 years of service time, which is a very big deal to a guy like Nick Green.

    For a borderline ballplayer like Nick Green getting that 5 years of service time and qualifying for a pension is basically the difference between being set for life, or having to work for an hourly wage until you are 65.

    The way things work in baseball is, guys who are prima donnas when they are really role players, they always manage to get screwed, they get released before they can get their 5 years in, and spend the rest of their lives bitter, believing that they really were starters, but their manager was the boogie man and blackballed them out of baseball. On the other hand, and I have seen it time and again, guys like Nick Green, always manage to just get their 5 years in AND THEN they get released.

    The reason being is because let’s say the Red Sox go out and get a new starting shortstop this winter, and Lowery becomes the backup middle infielder, which is likely to happen. Then without even asking, Nick green has guys like Francona and Bobby Cox calling around baseball on his behalf, talking to teams that need a utility guy, telling them Nick Green is a guy who does things the right way, and he only needs a few more days for his pension.

    In the event that the Red Sox bring in a shortstop in the offseason, which is likely, I would guarantee you someone else would go and pick up Nick Green next season, and they would do so not because Nick Green is a starter, and not because he is the best backup available because guys like him are all over the place, and there will be several younger and slightly cheaper options to round out a 25 man roster.

    No, Nick Green will find a job, and make it to his 5 years of service time because baseball has an institutional standard of taking care of guys who do things the right way like Nick Green.

    Nick Green is doing as well as he is right now because he goes about his work in a professional way. Guys like him don’t go out at night, they always stay in shape, so when the team finds themselves in a spot like Boston did when Lowery and Lugo were hurt, they can help the team.

    Baseball has a long institutional standard of taking care of those who respect the game, and conversely, not taking care of those who do not respect the game, and going out of its way to do both.

    Holding down the fort and helping the team in the short term is something entirely different than being an every day player.

    Nick Green is a great guy, and a competent professional, and the Red Sox and the game of baseball will in the end do the right thing by Nick Green, but that only goes so far.

    Terry Francona is running a Major League ballclub, not a soup kitchen.

    Francona knows, and Epstein knows, and every guy in the Red Sox clubhouse including Green knows, that the only thing Green has done over the past few weeks was what was expected of him. Hold down the fort in the short term until reinforcements arrive.

    Nobody in the Red Sox organization, including Nick Green, expects Nick Green to be the starting shortstop on August 1.

    Comment by Eric Gallagher | June 15, 2009 | Reply


Leave a comment